Macdonald Laurier Institute - Ottawa, ON, Sept. 27/2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fears of economic, social and political disruption are on the minds of politicians in the West. In response, many governments, including Canada, have refocused on income distribution, hoping that addressing income inequality will help restore economic stability.
One such policy is the abolition of the "Ontario Basic Income Pilot" by the previous Ontario government, which aims to guarantee a stable income regardless of work or other circumstances. However, despite the good intentions, do these types of programs do more harm than good?
Macdonald Laurier Institute
MLI Director Brian Lee Crowley and Munk Senior Fellow Sean Speer answer this question in a new report titled Canada's Jobs and Opportunities Program.
Canada's Productivity And Growth Will Be Curtailed 'for Years To Come': Economist
Examining the effects of substituting wage labor for unconditional payments, Crowley and Speer concluded that high tax policies and high government spending were not only economically harmful. , but the people who seem to want to help him are not well understood and the service is not very good. good.
"Most people are worried about jobs and opportunities. They don't want unconditional payments from the government," the author said. "They want to feel like they're contributing."
This report finds that high tax rates are doing more harm than good to Canada. Rather than focusing solely on equality, the most effective way to provide financial and social support to those struggling with poverty is to pursue policies that focus more on economic growth and opportunity.
"High growth is the best way to expand opportunity for as many people as possible. The best way to achieve that goal is to free the market economy from dead government," Crowley and Speer said.
Representative Harry Tseng Delivered A Keynote...
Crowley and Speer, on the other hand, have set a different agenda, one centered on expanding jobs and opportunities for all Canadians. The jobs and opportunity agenda begins primarily by deducting Canada's "Decade of Redemption" in the 1990s, when it launched economic and social reforms. Loans from federal and state governments to reduce the size of government and support businesses, investors and workers. savings, investment and the creation of new economic activities.
The "redemptive decade" should be understood as the time when politicians understood that the emphasis should shift from high taxes and redistribution (including public works) to discipline, finance, deregulation, investment and growth. It's a formula that has resulted in economic growth, investment and job creation for Canada, as well as significant reductions in poverty. Today's politicians would be wise to revisit these lessons.
In addition, Crowley and Speer counter the week's criticism of the annual guaranteed income with seven more targeted but positive policy recommendations to strengthen the Jobs and Opportunities in Canada agenda: The Macdonald-Laurier Institute has received much attention for its recent calls. stricter sanctions. against China and Iran, which will inevitably bring Canada into further conflict with these two countries. What is less known, however, is their close relationship with the Latvian government. Since declaring independence from the Soviet Union in 1990, Latvia has been ruled by a right-wing, anti-Russian government. In 2004, Latvia joined NATO and has since supported the West's widespread imperialism against Russia.
The Latvian government has a long history of funding imperialist ideas, from the US-based Atlantic Council (at least until 2015), the Latvian Institute of International Affairs and the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (as of 2017).
Renée Depocas Portfolio
In June 2016, under pressure from NATO allies, the Trudeau government committed to sending troops to NATO's "advanced brigade" preparing to deploy to Latvia. Canadian Defense Minister Harjit Sajjan said at the time that Canada would take the lead and deploy one of the battle groups requested by the coalition. Canada will be the lead nation in NATO's "Enhanced Forward Presence" Framework Nation as it deploys 450 troops to Latvia, nearly half of NATO's total of 1,138 foreign ground forces, costing Canadian taxpayers $134 million a year. .
In the 2017 report of the MLI, it was announced that the Ministry of Defense of Latvia became the funder of the institute. However, the amount of their giving was not disclosed in the Institute's 2017 CRA tax return, nor in the Charity Data report, which includes the exact dollar amount for only some of the donors.
In their 2016 tax return, the institute stated that 68.17 percent of their donations were gifts, while "unclaimed gifts" and "All other income" accounted for 31.83 percent of the support. This means that out of the total revenue of $1,641,815.00, donations accounted for $1,119,221.00 of that revenue.
Here is a list of 2016 donors from CharityData.ca. This data comes from donors who have declared that they have given to MLI.
Levits Gives Thoughts To Canadian Thinktank / Article
However, the amount of donations received from the Latvian Ministry of Defense was not disclosed in MLI's 2017 CRA tax report, nor in the Charity Data report, where for some donors the amount is exact dollars.
In its 2017 tax return, the institute reported that 61.62 percent of its donations were gifts received, while "gifts not received" and "All income" accounted for 38.37 percent of funding. This means that of the total revenue of $2,089,738.00, donations received accounted for $1,287,791.00 of that amount.
Here's a list of 2017 donors, courtesy of CharityData.ca. This data comes from donors who have declared that they have given to MLI.
Of the $1,287,791 in donations, only $607,734 (31.8 percent) came publicly. Non-revenue income accounts for $849,516 of the Institute's income, while anonymous gifts are ($1,323,594 - $421,694 = $901,900). If you add these two (data points) together, you will see that ($849,516 + $901,000 = $1,750,516) in donations are not traceable to the donor or the amount given to MLI.
The Macdonald Laurier Institute
In its 2018 tax return, the Institute stated that 60.91 percent of the donations received were received gifts, while 39.09 percent of their income was "donations not received", "charitable gifts in other names" and "all other funds". financing. This means that of the total revenue of $2,173,110, donations accounted for $1,323,594 of that amount.
Here is a list of 2018 donors from CharityData.ca. This data comes from donors who have declared that they have given to MLI.
Of the $1,323,594 in donations, only $421,694 (31.8 percent) was recorded on T3010. Non-revenue income accounts for $849,516 of the Institute's income, while anonymous gifts are ($1,323,594 - $421,694 = $901,900). If you add these two (data points) together, you will see that ($849,516 + $901,000 = $1,750,516) in donations are not traceable to the donor or the amount given to MLI.
According to MLI's 2018 T3010 charitable tax form, the Center received $394,432 in "funds received by Totalnontax from sources outside of Canada (government and non-government)." This represents an increase of $119,432 over 2016, when the Institute received $275,000 of this revenue.
Heather Exner Pirot
However, since the Institute has refused to release full financial data, an analysis of publicly available tax information for 2018 suggests that up to 80.5 percent ($1,750,516 of total revenue of $2,173,110 in 2018) is the current MLI - may come from funding from the Latvian Ministry of Defence.
One year after the Latvian Ministry of Defense began funding the MLI, on June 11, 2018, the Macdonald-Laurier Institute launched the Canada in the Baltics initiative. This initiative has been described as "aimed at exploring what NATO can do to better protect its eastern borders...against threats from Russia."
The centerpiece of that original announcement was a 40-page research paper titled "On the Baltic Watch: Canada's Past, Present and Future Towards an Enhanced NATO Presence in Latvia."
This article details Canada's involvement in Latvia as of 2018, respecting both the widespread imperialism of the post-World War II Soviet Union and NATO's current violence against Russia, while arguing for Canada's continued role in NATO. became ambassador. In a separate introductory paragraph, the MLI openly brags that NATO's presence causes Russia to spend more money on defense while being hit with heavy sanctions, reducing its ability to spend on valuable social programs or fighting economic inequality in their communities. MLI hopes this will undermine the legitimacy of the Russian government:
Hotspots H2o: Canadian Government Misses Target To End Water Insecurity For First Nations Communities
"Sanctions are strangling the [Russian] economy" when it comes to security issues. Russia spends more money on defense, which has a very detrimental effect on the government's ability to spend on this economic and social issue, and therefore on its legitimacy. belongs to the population, who bears the consequences." (page 20 of the paper)
The press also complained that Trump violated the NATO consensus and tried to negotiate peaceful relations with North Korea.
Macdonald laurier, laurier mercier, laurier 62, mont laurier, heather macdonald manhattan institute for policy research, fairmont laurier, portugese laurier, laurier, laurier institute, sir john a macdonald collegiate institute, heather macdonald manhattan institute, sir wilfrid laurier collegiate institute ranking
0 Comments